1/6 Committee Expresses Frustration as Contempt Expenses Pile Up at DOJ

[ad_1]

Members of the Home Choose Committee tasked with investigating the January 6 revolt have expressed frustration with the Division of Justice (DOJ), which has responded slowly to suggestions to hunt costs towards Trump administration aides which have defied the committee by refusing to seem for depositions or present paperwork.

“The Division of Justice has an obligation to behave on this referral and others that we have now despatched,” mentioned Consultant Adam Schiff (D-Calif.).

“With out enforcement of Congressional subpoenas, there isn’t a oversight, and with out oversight, no accountability — for the previous President, or some other president, previous, current, or future. With out enforcement of its lawful course of, Congress ceases to be a co-equal department of presidency, and the steadiness of energy could be eternally altered, to the lasting detriment of the American individuals,” he mentioned.

Final evening, the committee voted to carry the Trump administration’s former commerce and manufacturing director Peter Navarro and former communications chief Daniel Scavino Jr. in contempt for refusing to adjust to committee subpoenas.

“They probably performed an element in an assault on American democracy, however they’ll ignore our investigation as a result of they labored for the federal government on the time. That’s their argument,” mentioned Committee Chairman Bennie G. Thompson (D-Miss.). “They’re not fooling anyone. They’re obligated to adjust to our investigation. They’ve refused to take action, and that’s a criminal offense.”

To this point, the Justice Division has solely filed costs towards Steve Bannon, former President Donald Trump’s ex-chief strategist. It has not responded to an identical report relating to Mark Meadows, Trump’s former Chief of Workers.

In December 2021, prosecutors overseeing the case towards Bannon made clear they’ll make their case towards him in a single day, in accordance to a courtroom submitting.

“The Authorities anticipates that its case-in-chief will encompass in the future of testimony,” prosecutors mentioned within the report, including that they wish to prohibit Bannon from using any protection that claims that he was performing on the recommendation of his attorneys when he defied the subpoena from the Home Choose Committee tasked with investigating the occasions of January 6.

Bannon’s trial is ready to start in June. He faces as much as two years in jail and $200,000 in fines if convicted.

[ad_2]


Posted

in

by

Tags:

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *